Introduction

This report is a 6 month aggregation of statistical information gathered by the National Police Misconduct Statistics and Reporting Project (NPMSRP) in the months of April through September of 2009.

The project utilizes media reports of police misconduct to generate statistical information on police misconduct in order to approximate the prevalence of police misconduct in the United States since no other current statistical information on police misconduct is available.

Since this project was initiated in beta phase starting in April of 2009 this report is the first mid-year (6 month) statistical report that focuses in on local law enforcement agencies whereas previous statistical reports reviewed national averages with a general overview of state-wide misconduct rates. (To view the semi-annual police misconduct report please visit here).

All local population and law enforcement agency employment numbers are supplied by the FBI/DOJ UCR program’s 2008 report, which is the most current data available, and statistical information is generated by utilizing those numbers along with current misconduct data gathered through the NPMSRP.

Please note that, since this project utilizes data about law enforcement agencies as supplied by the FBI/DOJ Uniform Crime Reporting program, not all local law enforcement agencies are included in this report. Notably, among the missing agencies are all agencies in West Virginia and other individual agencies such as Columbus Ohio, which do not participate in the UCR program.

Law Enforcement Agencies Employing 1000+ Officers

The following are the top 20 local law enforcement agencies by police misconduct rates (in projected percentages) that employ over 1000 law enforcement officers:

Law Enforcement Agencies Employing 500-999 Officers

The following are the top 20 local law enforcement agencies by police misconduct rates (in projected percentages) that employ 500 to 999 law enforcement officers:

Law Enforcement Agencies Employing 100-499 Officers

The following are the top 20 local law enforcement agencies by police misconduct rates (in projected percentages) that employ 100 to 499 law enforcement officers:

Law Enforcement Agencies Employing 50-99 Officers

The following are the top 20 local law enforcement agencies by police misconduct rates (in projected percentages) that employ 50 to 99 law enforcement officers:

Key Definitions

PMR% – Police Misconduct Rate Percentage, this number is the percentage of law enforcement officers within a given agency which were involved in a reported instance of police misconduct in the media.

Reports – This is not the actual number of reported instances of police misconduct, but the number of law enforcement officers cited in that location’s police misconduct reports.

Notes

The tables in this report are segmented due to how a small number of incidents in smaller law enforcement agencies can throw off the percentages. For example, some agencies with under 10 law enforcement officers have Police Misconduct Rates above 100% before the rate is projected out to 1 year, which means the department had more officers involved in alleged misconduct than the total number of officers listed for the 2008 UCR reports.

While the explanations for this can range from either there being more officers in 2009 than what were listed in 2008 or that officers hired to replace ones fired for misconduct were also involved in misconduct complaints during that period. It still shows how, if all local agencies were listed by rate without regard to size, how the top ranked would be agencies under 50 members.

The projected rates listed can be divided by 2 in order to determine the current actual misconduct rate over the six month period for which the misconduct data was gathered. Another report is planned for the end-of-year which will be a 9 month aggregate report… The first possible “full year” report that will take data from a full 12 months will occur in January of 2011, if the project stays up that long.

Additional reports may be forthcoming if an interest is shown in the above data, including reports on the misconduct-related fatality rates per agency and the victims per capita rates as well, for example. Also, a full listing of all local agencies may be posted in the near future in some form, again, depending on the level of interest.

For any questions or requests, please contact us at News@InjusticeEverywhere.com or leave a comment below.

UPDATE: For more current statistics, including our 2009 Annual Report that contains all data from 2009, please visit our Police Misconduct Statistical Report menu page.

Introduction

The National Police Misconduct Statistics and Reporting Project utilizes news media reports of police misconduct to generate statistical information in an effort to approximate how prevalent police misconduct may be in the United States.

As part of this project, reported incidents of misconduct are aggregated into a news feed on Twitter and added into an off-line database where duplicate entries and updates are removed and remaining unique stories are categorized for statistical information in monthly, quarterly, and yearly reports here on this site. To view data from other months, refer to the Police Misconduct Statistics menu item located on the top menu bar.

*Note: This report is for incidents in October 2009 only. For more detailed aggregated statistics, please visit The NPMSRP 2009 Semi-Annual Police Misconduct Statistics Report which was released on 10/09/09.

General Statistics

The following report was generated from data gathered in the month of October 2009. In this month alone there were:

432 – Alleged incidents of reported police misconduct that were tracked in national news media.
13.9 – Reported incidents that were tracked per day on average.
534 – Law enforcement officers that were cited in those reports.
35 – Law enforcement leaders (police chiefs & sheriffs) that were cited in those reports.
554 – Alleged victims specifically cited in those recorded reports.
30 – Fatalities reported in connection with alleged instances of misconduct or criminal activity.
$24,658,500 – Reported costs in police misconduct related civil litigation (not counting undisclosed settlements or legal fees).

Categorization

When examining misconduct reports by type, the top 3 complaints:
15.5% (67) were excessive force complaints.
14.8% (64) were sexual misconduct complaints (25 involved minors).
10.0% (43) were financial crime (theft/fraud) complaints.

When examining reports by last reported status:
22.9% resulted in punitive actions taken against the officer involved.
35.2% were prosecuted criminally.
35.5% of criminal cases resulted in convictions.

Localization

10 worst cities by total number of reports in October alone:
1. New York NY 12
2. Chicago IL 10
3. Memphis TN 4
3. San Jose CA 4
5. Atlanta GA 3
5. Baltimore MD 3
5. Broward Co FL 3
5. Dallas TX 3
5. Dolton IL 3
5. Los Angeles CA 3
5. Minneapolis MN 3
5. New Orleans 3
5. Phoenix AZ 3
5. Portland OR 3
5. St. Louis MO 3
5. Seattle WA 3

10 worst states ranked by projected officer misconduct per capita rate:
1. West Virginia (17) – 5368.42 per 100k
2. Indiana (22) – 2523.90 per 100k
3. Washington (22) – 2489.39 per 100k
4. New Hampshire (5) – 2338.27 per 100k
5. Minnesota (16) – 2165.09 per 100k
6. Oregon (10) – 2037.35 per 100k
7. New Mexico (6) – 1747.57 per 100k
8. South Dakota (2) – 1675.98 per 100k
9. Connecticut (12) – 1668.21 per 100k
10. Illinois (51) – 1643.04 per 100k
(National projected average from semi-annual report is 834.69 per 100k)

The 10 worst state rankings by sheer number:
1. Texas – 55 (1252.97 per 100k)
2. Illinois – 51 (1643.04 per 100k)
3. California – 49 (723.37 per 100k)
4. New York – 34 (665.26 per 100k)
5. Florida – 31 (836.26 per 100k)
6. Indiana – 22 (2532.90 per 100k)
7. Washington – 22 (2489.39 per 100k)
8. Louisiana – 22 (1525.48 per 100k)
9. West Virginia – 17 (5368.42 per 100k)
10. Minnesota – 16 (2165.09 per 100k)

Projections

By projecting this month’s totals out to one year, the following comparisons can be made between the reported police misconduct allegation rate and the reported general crime rate* as published by the FBI and DOJ for 2008 (*please note that both the police misconduct and general crime rate statistics are allegations, not convictions):

General:

1 out of every 104.3 police officers in the US will be implicated in an act of misconduct or criminality in the news if October’s statistics were the average through the year of 2009.

Violent Crime:

• 1 out of every 263 police officers will be accused of a violent crime.
• 1 out of every 220 citizens will be accused of a violent crime.

Homicide

• 1 out of every 1,604 police officers will be accused of murder, manslaughter, homicide, or causing a fatality unnecessarily in an act of assault or brutality.
• 1 out of every 18,518 citizens will be accused of homicide, manslaughter, murder, or other act that unnecessarily takes a life.

Sexual Assault

• 1 out of every 1,237 police officers will be accused of sexual assault.
• 1 out of every 3,413 citizens will be accused of sexual assault.

Terminology

Misconduct Types:

Accountability – Incidents involving evidence of police misconduct cover-ups, lack of investigations, allegations of lax disciplinary response to sustained allegations, and other activities that involve accountability policies or processes.

Animal Cruelty – Acts of violence resulting in harm to animals both on and off duty that may include unnecessary shooting incidents, inappropriate training of K9 units, or other such activities.

Assault – Unwarranted violence occurring while off-duty

Brutality – Unwarranted or excessive hysical violence occurring while on-duty

Civil Rights – Violations of general civil liberties that would be ruled unconstitutional yet not covered by other categories. For example, excessive force would be a violation of constitutionally protected rights, but is already covered in the Brutality class. However, complaints of warrantless eavesdropping or illegal disruptions of lawful protests would be deemed civil rights violations.

Sexual – Sex related incidents including rape, sexual assault, harassment, coercion, prostitution, sex on duty, incest, and molestation.

Theft – includes robbery, theft, shoplifting, fraud, extortion, and bribery

Shooting – gun-related incidents both on and off-duty, including self-harm

Color of Law – incidents that involve misuse of authority such as bribery or extortion by threat of arrest

Murder – non-negligent homicides occurring outside of the line of duty.

Perjury – includes false testimony, dishonesty during investigations, falsified charging papers, and falsified warrants.

Misconduct Status/Outcomes:
Allegation – First stage of a misconduct complaint, can be from victim, witnesses, relatives of the victim, and other sources. Simply an allegation of misconduct.

Investigation – Second stage of a misconduct complaint, can be an internal investigation, criminal investigation, external investigation, or a DOJ/FBI civil rights investigation.

Lawsuits – Civil complaints filed in court, generally requires more evidence than a simple allegation, but still within the realm of allegations.

Charges – Criminal complaints filed in court, generally requires more evidence than a simple allegation, but still within the realm of allegations.

Trials – Criminal trials in court, requires enough evidence to establish probable cause, higher threshold than civil litigation or criminal charges, but still allegations.

Judgments – These are rulings that support a civil litigation complaint but also include settlement agreements that are typically, officially, said to not be admissions of guilt. Should be considered a confirmed case of misconduct.

Disciplinary – Results of investigations that confirm misconduct complaints but do not result in termination of employment.

Firings – Results of investigations that confirm misconduct severe enough to warrant termination of employment.

Convictions – Results of criminal trials that confirm allegations serious enough to warrant criminal charges. These include both rulings and guilty pleas.

Methodology

Information Gathering:
Data is gathered from various media outlets by manual searches and review of daily news stories several times a day. There are no sufficient key terms that work well enough to automate this data gathering tasks, the results must be vetted by human intervention.

Information Storage:
Confirmed stories about police misconduct that have been vetted to ensure that the story is about a case of misconduct or allegation of misconduct are published to a Twitter-based National Police Misconduct NewsFeed. From there, the stories are copied to a spreadsheet where they can later be sorted and analyzed.

Data Analysis:
At the first day of the month, data from the previous month is sorted and analyzed in the spreadsheet. All duplicate stories, stories that are informational, stories involving policy, and legislative issues are purged from the spreadsheet. Any items involving a status change about a specific incident are culled so that only the latest status story remains to avoid duplicate data.

Data Presentation:
After all data has been analyzed it is presented on this site by General, Geographical, Type, and Status datasets.

Important Notes:
The data collected and presented here should only be used to provide a very basic and general view of the extent of police misconduct within the US. It is, by no means, an accurate gauge that truly represents the exact extent of police misconduct since it relies on the information voluntarily gathered and/or released to the media, not from information gathered first-hand by independent monitors who investigate complaints of misconduct since no such agency exists nationally.

This information has been gathered here because nobody else is gathering it and the national government has not gathered it for several years. Keep in mind that geographical distribution of misconduct reports can be representative of concentrations of corruption or permissive attitudes towards abusive police policies or can be indications of more open information sharing between police agencies and local media along with departmental efforts to reduce misconduct by actively engaging problematic officers. There is no real way to determine which is the case since there is no independent monitoring and investigation into allegations of police misconduct.

In generally, monthly reports do not provide as accurate a depiction of the overall extent of police misconduct in the US as do quarterly and yearly reports as there is a fair amount of fluctuation between incident types and rates month by month. Therefore, monthly reports should only be considered as the state of police misconduct in that month itself while the longer-term reports paint a more comprehensive and accurate picture of police misconduct in the US.

As always, I appreciate any recommendations, advice, requests, and general comments.

Thank you.

Please Note that statistics listed in this post are very rough estimates based on rough projections so don’t accept them as gospel… This is just a demonstration to put the numbers this project generates into perspective.

Statistics are an interesting thing, simply put it’s nothing more than distilling a limited sample of something into a ratio or likelihood of occurrence. So, it’s a way that we gauge how often something happens within a certain time range in comparable sample sets, whether that’s how many people might die of a certain disease within a year or how many police officers are likely to be involved with an incident of misconduct within a year.

Now, the number of occurrences within a set period of time, let’s say within a year, might seem small. For example, based on 2008 statistics, the US murder rate was 5.4 per 100k. Now, that’s a pretty small number, especially expressed as a percentage (.0054%) but we can look at it this way:

US Murder Rate 2008 = 5.4 per 100k
US Murder Rate Avg Lifetime = 389.5 per 100k
In other words, 1 in 256.7 Americans might be murdered within the course of their lifetimes based on the 2008 statistics.

As we see, in statistics, the frame of reference means everything and that’s something we have to keep in mind when we look at the statistics this project generates.

Again, for example, the 2009 semi-annual NPMSRP statistics report indicated that about 834.7 of every 100k police officers may be involved in a reported police misconduct incident this year.

Might not seem like much, especially when we express it as a percentage (.835%) but let’s look at what happens when we look at what that means over the average career span of a law enforcement officer in the US.

Within the average 25 year career span of a US law enforcement officer, based on the 2009 NPMSRP Semi-Annual PMR, roughly 1 out of every 4.7 police officers will be involved in an alleged act of police misconduct egregious enough to wind up reported in the news. So let’s break that down:

Estimated Police Misconduct Rate (PMR) in 2009 = 834.69 per 100k
Average career PMR = 20,867.25 per 100k
In other words, 1 in 4.7 police officers may be implicated in an act of misconduct over the course of their career.

So, if you were a police officer, you are more likely, about 55 times more likely in fact, to be implicated in an act of police misconduct over the course of your 25 year career than the likelihood that any given average US citizen will die of murder.

In fact… given the current number of line-of-duty officer deaths so far this year, we can estimate that 16.71 of 100,000 officers will die in the line of duty this year, which happens to be a projected 119 deaths based on the total of 99 deaths so far this year.

Over the 25 year average service length, based on this average over time, would mean that, very roughly, 1 in 239.4 police officers will die in the line of duty within their career on average… again, breaking that down:

Estimated Law Enforcement Deaths in 2009 = 16.71 per 100k
Est Career Law Enforcement Death rate = 417.75 per 100k
In other words, 1 in 239.4 police officers may die in the line of duty in the course of their career.

So, police officers may be over 7x more likely to be implicated in an act of police misconduct than they are to die in the line of duty from any cause.

What about officer deaths from homicidal or felonious assaults you ask?

Estimated 2009 LEO deaths by violence = 6.4 per 100k
Est Career LEO deaths by violence = 160 per 100k
In other words, 1 in 625.0 police officers might be killed by violence, (firearms, vehicular assault, assault, etc), in the line of duty over the course of their career.

which means an officer is over 130 times more likely to be implicated in an act of misconduct than to be killed by intentional violence in the line of duty.

So, with the statistics we can do a number of comparisons:

Of course, as I warned at the beginning, these calculations are all very rough estimates that don’t take into account variables like projected trending based on historical trending data. But none of that exists for police misconduct rates, so it’s the best that can be done at the moment… which is something this project is trying to address. But at least this might help you put these numbers in a bit of perspective.

Updated 10/28/09 20:18 – Corrected police fatalities via homicide to correspond with DOJ/FBI UCR murder rate statistical criteria per comments below.